SHPP

Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF

Pacer · $2.0m in assets, October 8, 2026

SHPP, the Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF, is a $2 million ETF whose main story is the defense trade. Over the past year it returned +22.0%, against +16.8% for broad US ETFs. Figures to October 2, 2026; past performance, not a recommendation.

SHPP · the ETFFRI OCT 2Market price total return
+11.2% a yearTotal return since launch, June 2022
+22.0%Last 12 months
+17.1%Year to date
17.1%Volatility since launch

The narrative it carries

This is its only narrative.

The defense trade →

Defense contractors, defense technology and the industrial companies around them, paid from government budgets.

The defense trade · the narrative this week
48.6WARM level, 12 of 22
last four weeks
67ETFs carry it
82.5%held by the top five
XLIlargest holder, 38.8%
$78.9 bncapital, 14th of 22

The band is where this narrative’s level sits among the 22 this week. QUIET means less talked about, not falling.

Who owns the capital
XLI 38.8%ITA 15.8%VIS 11.1%PPA 9.6%XAR 7.2%62 other ETFs 17.5%82.5%top five
#ETFSHAREASSETS1 YEARCOST
1XLI38.8%$29.83bn+11.5%0.08%
2ITA15.8%$12.14bn−0.5%0.37%
3VIS11.1%$8.52bn+11.0%0.09%
4PPA9.6%$7.40bn+0.1%0.58%
5XAR7.2%$5.54bn−1.9%0.35%
62 other ETFs17.5%
SHPP: 0.0%

Share is each ETF’s slice of the capital carrying this narrative. 1 year is market price total return; cost is the expense ratio. See all 67 ETFs on the narrative page →

FRI OCT 2MARKET PRICE TOTAL RETURN

1M3MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*
SHPP−1.3%+0.7%+17.1%+22.0%+13.9%–
The defense tradeits narrative−3.2%−10.2%+4.9%+5.2%+24.3%+14.7%
The marketbroad US ETFs+0.8%+2.6%+14.6%+16.8%+22.9%+12.9%

1M, 3M, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y: one month to five years. YTD: year to date. * A year, annualised. A dash means the ETF has not traded for the whole period. Since it started trading on June 10, 2022: +11.2% a year.

$10,000 invested June 30, 2022

SHPP $16,111The defense trade $22,150The market $21,502
$0$10,000$20,000$30,000Jun 2022Jun 2023Jun 2024Jun 2025Jun 2026$0$10,000$20,000$30,000Jun 2022Jun 2024Jun 2026

Year by year

SHPPThe defense tradeThe market
0%10%20%30%40%SHPP 2023: +20.9%Narrative 2023: +18.9%The market 2023: +27.9%2023SHPP 2024: +0.8%Narrative 2024: +19.6%The market 2024: +23.1%2024SHPP 2025: +12.9%Narrative 2025: +31.7%The market 2025: +16.8%2025SHPP YTD: +17.1%Narrative YTD: +4.9%The market YTD: +14.6%YTD0%10%20%30%40%SHPP 2023: +20.9%Narrative 2023: +18.9%The market 2023: +27.9%2023SHPP 2024: +0.8%Narrative 2024: +19.6%The market 2024: +23.1%2024SHPP 2025: +12.9%Narrative 2025: +31.7%The market 2025: +16.8%2025SHPP YTD: +17.1%Narrative YTD: +4.9%The market YTD: +14.6%YTD

Total return in each calendar year; this year is year to date. A year appears only if SHPP traded for all of it.

Total return on the market price, with each distribution reinvested on its ex-date. Not the NAV return the issuer publishes; the two differ when the ETF trades above or below the value of its holdings. The narrative is the asset-weighted return of the unlevered ETFs that carry it. The market is the asset-weighted return of broad US index ETFs. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Common questions

What story is SHPP selling?

SHPP’s main story is the defense trade, which covers defense contractors, defense technology and the industrial companies around them, paid from government budgets.

Which ETFs compete with SHPP?

The ETFs whose weekly returns move most like SHPP’s over the past 3 years are SUPL (0.93), RSPE (0.86) and EBI (0.86).

How has SHPP performed against its story?

Over the past year SHPP returned +22.0%, the ETFs carrying the defense trade +5.2% and broad US ETFs +16.8%, to October 2, 2026. Its weekly returns have a correlation of 0.71 with the story. Past performance only.

Run an ETF in the defense trade? StoryVector shows issuers where their ETFs stand against the closest rivals, every week.

Request a pilot
Narrative figures are from the weekly board. Performance is market price total return as of October 2, 2026. Assets are StoryVector’s weekly figure. Classification and measurement. Not investment advice. How the measurement works →