Board/One of 22

The biology trade

Health care from drugmakers and insurers to genomics: the science that gets approved, and who pays for it.

The biology trade is one of 22 market stories StoryVector measures. 92 US ETFs carry it, with $119 billion between them; the largest holder, XLV, holds 36.3% of its capital. This week it ranks 20th of 22 for attention, in the QUIET band. Over the past year its ETFs returned +24.2%, against +16.8% for broad US ETFs, to October 2, 2026; past performance, not a recommendation.

41.2QUIET level, 20 of 22
last four weeks
92ETFs carry it
73.3%held by the top five
XLVlargest holder, 36.3%
$119 bncapital, 10th of 22

Where it sits this week

Its level among all 22 on the fixed 25 to 60 scale. The band is where the level sits this week, not a direction.

25QUIET below 41.4HOT from 57.460
What its ETFs returnedFRI OCT 2market price total return

Its ETFs ranked among the narratives, lowest to highest. The white notch is this one; the thin tick is where broad US ETFs would sit. Measured and past, not a forecast.

+0.02%Friday · US +0.79%lowest −1.17%highest +3.50%17th of 22
−3.5%Last month · US +0.8%lowest −5.8%highest +15.1%17th of 22
+13.7%This year · US +14.6%lowest −3.8%highest +47.8%9th of 22
+24.2%Last 12 months · US +16.8%lowest −37.2%highest +50.2%3rd of 21
0.23% cost to own, a year, weighted · largest holder XLV 0.08%Every period and the 10-year chart ↓

How it is talked about

What the story is about, where its attention comes from, what sets it off, and what it shares ETFs with.

The argumentsigned off

Health care stocks move on trial results and on what insurers pay. Is this narrative about new science, or about who pays for care?

Science

Genomics, gene editing and new drugs such as the obesity treatments are changing what medicine can do. The value is in what gets discovered and approved.

Payment

Most of the capital sits in large drugmakers, insurers, hospitals and device makers. Their results depend on what governments and insurers pay, more than on any single breakthrough.

What would separate them. What moves results. Trial results and approvals fit the first reading. Drug pricing rules, reimbursement and patent expiries fit the second.

Broad health care ETFs hold most of the capital here, and genomics ETFs a small part. We measure the attention and the capital, not the outcome of any trial.

Where the attention comes from
News56.8
Video56.8
Reference pages45.2
Search43.7
Investor message boards32.4
Forums12.1
041.2 combined100
What sets it off
Pharmaceutical and biotech results4 stories
Corporate action at named companies1 story
Clinical readouts and drug approvals1 story
Wire stories filed to this narrative since August 24, by the kind of event. A count of stories, not of outcomes.

Who owns it

92 ETFs carry this narrative; 84 have it as their main one. Here is how its capital divides among them.

Its slice of all 22
1.5%
$119 bnof the $8.1 tn across all 2210th by capital
How its capital divides
top five hold 73.3% · 87 other ETFs hold 26.7%
ETFShare1 yearCost
1XLV36.3%+18.0%0.08%
2VHT15.3%+18.9%0.09%
3IBB9.4%+37.5%0.44%
4XBI8.7%+51.2%0.35%
5IXJ3.6%+11.8%–

What its ETFs returned

The asset-weighted return of the unlevered ETFs that carry this narrative, against broad US ETFs. Measured and past, not a forecast.

FRI OCT 2market price total return
1M3MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*
The biology tradeits ETFs, unlevered−3.5%+2.1%+13.7%+24.2%+15.2%+6.7%
rank among the narratives17th of 229th of 229th of 223rd of 2115th of 2115th of 21
The marketbroad US ETFs+0.8%+2.6%+14.6%+16.8%+22.9%+12.9%

1M, 3M, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y: one month to five years. YTD: year to date. * A year, annualized. Rank is among the narratives with a full record for the period. A dash means the narrative’s ETFs do not cover the whole period.

$10,000 invested October 31, 2016

The biology trade $30,404The market $42,209
$0$10k$20k$30k$40k$50kOct 2016Oct 2018Oct 2020Oct 2022Oct 2024Oct 2026
$0$10k$20k$30k$40k$50kOct 2016Oct 2020Oct 2026

Year by year

The biology tradeThe market
−20%0%20%40%2019 +23.9%2019 +31.3%20192020 +24.2%2020 +21.4%20202021 +13.1%2021 +27.1%20212022 -10.0%2022 -19.8%20222023 +6.0%2023 +27.9%20232024 +1.9%2024 +23.1%20242025 +19.5%2025 +16.8%2025YTD +13.7%YTD +14.6%YTD
−20%0%20%40%2019 +23.9%2019 +31.3%20192020 +24.2%2020 +21.4%20202021 +13.1%2021 +27.1%20212022 -10.0%2022 -19.8%20222023 +6.0%2023 +27.9%20232024 +1.9%2024 +23.1%20242025 +19.5%2025 +16.8%2025YTD +13.7%YTD +14.6%YTD

Total return on the market price, each distribution reinvested on its ex-date. The narrative is the asset-weighted return of the unlevered ETFs that carry it; the market is the asset-weighted return of broad US index ETFs. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

What is inside it

8 categories, each claimed by a written rule. The bar is each one’s share of the capital. The table names what decides each.

Broad health care 65.0%Biotech 21.5%Pharmaceuticals 4.9%Devices and providers 4.1%Genomics and health innovation 2.8%3 more 1.7%
CategoryETFsCapitalShare of the ETFsShare of the capital
Broad health careWhat governments and insurers pay for drugs and care, and patent expiries at the largest drugmakers21$77.1 bn25%65.0%
BiotechTrial results and regulatory approvals, and what it costs a company without profits to raise money8$25.5 bn10%21.5%
PharmaceuticalsDrug pricing rules and patent expiries6$5.8 bn7%4.9%
Devices and providersHow many procedures are performed and what insurers pay for them, and for insurers, medical costs against premiums3$4.8 bn4%4.1%
Genomics and health innovationProgress from trial to approved therapy in gene editing and sequencing, and the rate used to value profits years away14$3.4 bn17%2.8%
Levered and inverse wrappersThe day-to-day path of the biotech and health care indexes, which a daily reset compounds20$1.4 bn24%1.2%
Everything else8$0.4 bn10%0.4%
Obesity, aging and longevitySales and trial results for obesity drugs, and spending by and for older people4$0.2 bn5%0.1%

The widest gap: levered and inverse wrappers, 24% of the ETFs and 1.2% of the capital.

How the market built it

What issuers have listed with this as the main narrative, by wrapper.

64Unlevered long98.8% of the capital
17Levered long1.1% of the capital
3Inverse0.1% of the capital

What issuers have listed, not what anyone expects. A wrapper can be listed before anyone wants it, so a count of ETFs and a share of capital answer different questions.

Common questions

Which ETFs give exposure to the biology trade?

92 US ETFs carry it. The largest holders of its capital are XLV (36.3%), VHT (15.3%) and IBB (9.4%).

Which ETF holds the most of the biology trade?

XLV, with 36.3% of the capital in ETFs carrying the story; the top five hold 73.3%.

How loud is the biology trade right now?

Its attention level is 41.2 on a scale of 25 to 60, 20th of 22 this week, in the QUIET band. The level averages six channels: search, video, news, forums, investor boards and reference pages.

How has the biology trade performed?

Asset weighted, its ETFs returned +24.2% over the past year, against +16.8% for broad US ETFs, to October 2, 2026. Past performance only.

Run an ETF in the biology trade? StoryVector shows issuers where their ETFs stand against the closest rivals, every week.

Request a pilot
See all 22 ranked on the board →
Every figure on this page is this week’s. Returns are market price total return as of October 2, 2026, measured and past, not forecasts. The level is attention on a fixed 25 to 60 scale across six channels; the band is where it sits among the 22. Ownership is Capital Share of Narrative, exposure weighted. Capital is the assets of the ETFs with this as their main narrative; ownership shares are measured on exposure-weighted capital, a different total. ETFs are listed by measured share; placement cannot be bought. Nothing here is investment advice. How the measurement works →