Board/One of 22

The trade-war tax

Retailers, brands and US manufacturers: the companies that pay tariffs or are protected by them.

The trade-war tax is one of 22 market stories StoryVector measures. 30 US ETFs carry it, with $40 billion between them; the largest holder, XLY, holds 57.4% of its capital. This week it ranks 16th of 22 for attention, in the WARM band. Over the past year its ETFs returned −3.7%, against +16.8% for broad US ETFs, to October 2, 2026; past performance, not a recommendation.

43.1WARM level, 16 of 22
last four weeks
30ETFs carry it
98.4%held by the top five
XLYlargest holder, 57.4%
$39.9 bncapital, 18th of 22

Where it sits this week

Its level among all 22 on the fixed 25 to 60 scale. The band is where the level sits this week, not a direction.

25QUIET below 41.4HOT from 57.460
What its ETFs returnedFRI OCT 2market price total return

Its ETFs ranked among the narratives, lowest to highest. The white notch is this one; the thin tick is where broad US ETFs would sit. Measured and past, not a forecast.

+1.30%Friday · US +0.79%lowest −1.17%highest +3.50%5th of 22
−3.3%Last month · US +0.8%lowest −5.8%highest +15.1%16th of 22
−3.8%This year · US +14.6%lowest −3.8%highest +47.8%22nd of 22
−3.7%Last 12 months · US +16.8%lowest −37.2%highest +50.2%19th of 21
0.20% cost to own, a year, weighted · largest holder XLY 0.08%Every period and the 10-year chart ↓

How it is talked about

What the story is about, where its attention comes from, what sets it off, and what it shares ETFs with. This week it was measured on 5 of the six channels, and the channel chart is drawn only when all six report.

The argumentsigned off

Someone pays a tariff. Is it shoppers, through prices, or companies, through margins?

Prices

Importers pass the cost on and shoppers pay it. It shows up on the shelf and in household budgets.

Margins

Companies absorb the cost to hold prices and keep customers. It shows up in profits and profit forecasts, not on the shelf.

What would separate them. Where the cost lands. Higher shelf prices and weaker sales fit the first reading. Profit warnings and lowered forecasts with prices held fit the second.

Retailers and consumer brands hold most of the capital here, and either reading lands on them. We measure the attention and the capital, not who pays the tariff.

What sets it off
Trade policy actions: duties, bans and threats12 stories
Retailer and consumer brand results9 stories
US consumer prints5 stories
Strikes on shipping and energy facilities3 stories
US activity surveys2 stories
Wire stories filed to this narrative since August 24, by the kind of event. A count of stories, not of outcomes.

Who owns it

30 ETFs carry this narrative; 22 have it as their main one. Here is how its capital divides among them.

Its slice of all 22
0.5%
$39.9 bnof the $8.1 tn across all 2218th by capital
How its capital divides
top five hold 98.4% · 25 other ETFs hold 1.6%
ETFShare1 yearCost
1XLY57.4%−7.3%0.08%
2AIRR16.9%+10.0%0.69%
3VCR16.6%−6.1%0.09%
4FDIS4.4%−6.0%–
5IYC3.1%−8.3%0.37%

What its ETFs returned

The asset-weighted return of the unlevered ETFs that carry this narrative, against broad US ETFs. Measured and past, not a forecast.

FRI OCT 2market price total return
1M3MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*
The trade-war taxits ETFs, unlevered−3.3%−7.5%−3.8%−3.7%+15.0%+7.7%
rank among the narratives16th of 2218th of 2222nd of 2219th of 2116th of 2114th of 21
The marketbroad US ETFs+0.8%+2.6%+14.6%+16.8%+22.9%+12.9%

1M, 3M, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y: one month to five years. YTD: year to date. * A year, annualized. Rank is among the narratives with a full record for the period. A dash means the narrative’s ETFs do not cover the whole period.

$10,000 invested October 31, 2016

The trade-war tax $35,893The market $42,209
$0$10k$20k$30k$40k$50kOct 2016Oct 2018Oct 2020Oct 2022Oct 2024Oct 2026
$0$10k$20k$30k$40k$50kOct 2016Oct 2020Oct 2026

Year by year

The trade-war taxThe market
−40%−20%0%20%40%2019 +29.2%2019 +31.3%20192020 +31.6%2020 +21.4%20202021 +28.2%2021 +27.1%20212022 -30.7%2022 -19.8%20222023 +38.5%2023 +27.9%20232024 +27.3%2024 +23.1%20242025 +10.6%2025 +16.8%2025YTD -3.8%YTD +14.6%YTD
−40%−20%0%20%40%2019 +29.2%2019 +31.3%20192020 +31.6%2020 +21.4%20202021 +28.2%2021 +27.1%20212022 -30.7%2022 -19.8%20222023 +38.5%2023 +27.9%20232024 +27.3%2024 +23.1%20242025 +10.6%2025 +16.8%2025YTD -3.8%YTD +14.6%YTD

Total return on the market price, each distribution reinvested on its ex-date. The narrative is the asset-weighted return of the unlevered ETFs that carry it; the market is the asset-weighted return of broad US index ETFs. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

What is inside it

4 categories, each claimed by a written rule. The bar is each one’s share of the capital. The table names what decides each.

Consumer discretionary 76.4%US manufacturing 23.4%Levered and inverse wrappers 0.2%
CategoryETFsCapitalShare of the ETFsShare of the capital
Consumer discretionaryWhat households spend on things they can put off, and the cost of imported goods and parts5$30.5 bn23%76.4%
US manufacturingDomestic factory orders, and tariffs on competing imports against tariffs on imported parts and materials6$9.3 bn27%23.4%
Levered and inverse wrappers9$0.1 bn41%0.2%
Domestic revenueThe share of each company's sales earned at home2under $0.1 bn9%0.0%

The widest gap: levered and inverse wrappers, 41% of the ETFs and 0.2% of the capital.

How the market built it

What issuers have listed with this as the main narrative, by wrapper.

13Unlevered long99.8% of the capital
6Levered long0.1% of the capital
3Inverseunder 0.1% of the capital

What issuers have listed, not what anyone expects. A wrapper can be listed before anyone wants it, so a count of ETFs and a share of capital answer different questions.

Common questions

Which ETFs give exposure to the trade-war tax?

30 US ETFs carry it. The largest holders of its capital are XLY (57.4%), AIRR (16.9%) and VCR (16.6%).

Which ETF holds the most of the trade-war tax?

XLY, with 57.4% of the capital in ETFs carrying the story; the top five hold 98.4%.

How loud is the trade-war tax right now?

Its attention level is 43.1 on a scale of 25 to 60, 16th of 22 this week, in the WARM band. The level averages six channels: search, video, news, forums, investor boards and reference pages.

How has the trade-war tax performed?

Asset weighted, its ETFs returned −3.7% over the past year, against +16.8% for broad US ETFs, to October 2, 2026. Past performance only.

Run an ETF in the trade-war tax? StoryVector shows issuers where their ETFs stand against the closest rivals, every week.

Request a pilot
See all 22 ranked on the board →
Every figure on this page is this week’s. Returns are market price total return as of October 2, 2026, measured and past, not forecasts. The level is attention on a fixed 25 to 60 scale across six channels; the band is where it sits among the 22. Ownership is Capital Share of Narrative, exposure weighted. Capital is the assets of the ETFs with this as their main narrative; ownership shares are measured on exposure-weighted capital, a different total. ETFs are listed by measured share; placement cannot be bought. Nothing here is investment advice. How the measurement works →