Board/One of 22

The quantum frontier

Quantum computing developers and the chip companies beside them, and the distance from milestone to revenue.

The quantum frontier is one of 22 market stories StoryVector measures. 25 US ETFs carry it, with $7 billion between them; the largest holder, QTUM, holds 92.7% of its capital. This week it ranks 8th of 22 for attention, in the WARM band.

53.4WARM level, 8 of 22
last four weeks
25ETFs carry it
99.9%held by the top five
QTUMlargest holder, 92.7%
$6.5 bncapital, 20th of 22

Where it sits this week

Its level among all 22 on the fixed 25 to 60 scale. The band is where the level sits this week, not a direction.

25QUIET below 41.4HOT from 57.460
What its ETFs returnedFRI OCT 2market price total return

Its ETFs ranked among the narratives, lowest to highest. The white notch is this one; the thin tick is where broad US ETFs would sit. Measured and past, not a forecast.

+1.76%Friday · US +0.79%lowest −1.17%highest +3.50%3rd of 22
+7.8%Last month · US +0.8%lowest −5.8%highest +15.1%4th of 22
+42.2%This year · US +14.6%lowest −3.8%highest +47.8%2nd of 22
0.41% cost to own, a year, weighted · largest holder QTUM 0.40%Every period and the 10-year chart ↓

How it is talked about

What the story is about, where its attention comes from, what sets it off, and what it shares ETFs with. This week it was measured on 5 of the six channels, and the channel chart is drawn only when all six report.

The argumentsigned off

Quantum computing is still early. Are the milestones a path to a product, or a run of headlines?

Path

Better error correction, bigger machines and deals with governments and chipmakers mark real progress toward commercial computers, and revenue is starting.

Headlines

The milestones are research results. Useful machines are years away, and the listed companies trade on announcements.

What would separate them. Who pays, and for what. Customers paying for computing time and working systems fit the first reading. Grants, research contracts and demos fit the second.

One ETF, QTUM, holds most of the capital here, pairing quantum developers with chip and computing companies. We measure the attention and the capital, not the timeline.

What sets it off
Quantum computing results2 stories
Wire stories filed to this narrative since August 24, by the kind of event. A count of stories, not of outcomes.
Next door
Narratives that share ETFs with this one: an ETF carries a main narrative and, for some, a second one.

Who owns it

25 ETFs carry this narrative; 22 have it as their main one. Here is how its capital divides among them.

Its slice of all 22
0.1%
$6.5 bnof the $8.1 tn across all 2220th by capital
How its capital divides
top five hold 99.9% · 20 other ETFs hold 0.1%
ETFShare1 yearCost
1QTUM92.7%+44.6%0.40%
2WQTM5.8%–0.45%
3CHPX0.5%+98.8%0.50%
4QTUP0.5%–0.77%
5CQTM0.4%–0.35%

What its ETFs returned

The asset-weighted return of the unlevered ETFs that carry this narrative, against broad US ETFs. Measured and past, not a forecast.

FRI OCT 2market price total return
1M3MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*
The quantum frontierits ETFs, unlevered+7.8%+0.2%+42.2%–––
rank among the narratives4th of 2213th of 222nd of 22–––
The marketbroad US ETFs+0.8%+2.6%+14.6%+16.8%+22.9%+12.9%

1M, 3M, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y: one month to five years. YTD: year to date. * A year, annualized. Rank is among the narratives with a full record for the period. A dash means the narrative’s ETFs do not cover the whole period.

$10,000 invested October 31, 2025

The quantum frontier $13,517The market $11,485
$0$5k$10k$15kOct 2025Oct 2026
$0$5k$10k$15kOct 2025Oct 2026

Total return on the market price, each distribution reinvested on its ex-date. The narrative is the asset-weighted return of the unlevered ETFs that carry it; the market is the asset-weighted return of broad US index ETFs. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

What is inside it

3 categories, each claimed by a written rule. The bar is each one’s share of the capital. The table names what decides each.

Quantum ETFs 91.8%Levered and inverse wrappers 7.8%Pure-play quantum 0.3%
CategoryETFsCapitalShare of the ETFsShare of the capital
Quantum ETFsThe wider chip and computing market, and progress in quantum hardware for the smaller holdings4$6.0 bn18%91.8%
Levered and inverse wrappersThe day-to-day path of single quantum companies and two quantum baskets, which a daily reset compounds17$0.5 bn77%7.8%
Pure-play quantumMilestones and contracts at quantum developers with little revenue, and what it costs them to raise money1under $0.1 bn5%0.3%

The widest gap: levered and inverse wrappers, 77% of the ETFs and 7.8% of the capital.

How the market built it

What issuers have listed with this as the main narrative, by wrapper.

5Unlevered long92.2% of the capital
14Levered long7.3% of the capital
3Inverse0.5% of the capital

What issuers have listed, not what anyone expects. A wrapper can be listed before anyone wants it, so a count of ETFs and a share of capital answer different questions.

Common questions

Which ETFs give exposure to the quantum frontier?

25 US ETFs carry it. The largest holders of its capital are QTUM (92.7%), WQTM (5.8%) and CHPX (0.5%).

Which ETF holds the most of the quantum frontier?

QTUM, with 92.7% of the capital in ETFs carrying the story; the top five hold 99.9%.

How loud is the quantum frontier right now?

Its attention level is 53.4 on a scale of 25 to 60, 8th of 22 this week, in the WARM band. The level averages six channels: search, video, news, forums, investor boards and reference pages.

Run an ETF in the quantum frontier? StoryVector shows issuers where their ETFs stand against the closest rivals, every week.

Request a pilot
See all 22 ranked on the board →
Every figure on this page is this week’s. Returns are market price total return as of October 2, 2026, measured and past, not forecasts. The level is attention on a fixed 25 to 60 scale across six channels; the band is where it sits among the 22. Ownership is Capital Share of Narrative, exposure weighted. Capital is the assets of the ETFs with this as their main narrative; ownership shares are measured on exposure-weighted capital, a different total. ETFs are listed by measured share; placement cannot be bought. Nothing here is investment advice. How the measurement works →